Election News: Harper’s new deep integration plans for Canada!

September 24, 2008

This important message comes from ViveleCanada.ca. It is about Stephen Harper’s intentions to integrate Canada with the EU. So it’s not enough that he wants to more deeply integrate us with the US and Mexico via the SPP/NAU, Harper also wants to integrate us with the EU! If Harper is re-elected, will Canada retain any sovereignty at all? Canadians, please wake up! If we don’t act by ensuring that Stephen Harper does NOT get re-elected, we stand to lose our country!!  Stand up for Canada!!!

Hi everyone,

I’m writing to draw your attention to a couple of election-related items now up on Vive le Canada.ca.

First, we are helping promote a new video based on Mel Hurtig’s excellent book “The Truth About Canada” called “Who Killed Canada? A 2008 Election Primer”. The video was created by John Riddell with Mel Hurtig’s cooperation, and is a unique, fact-filled investigation, rich with information you will never see in the media, featuring Mel, produced and with commentary
by John Riddell. It is no less than a Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) of what is happening to Canada today.

It is an excellent tool in educating voters about the current situation in Canada and the need to take action to protect our sovereignty and democracy.

A portion of the proceeds from the sale of each video goes to helping Vive, a non-profit organization that exists solely on the donations of our members, continue to pay our hosting and web development bills.

To order visit: http://www.thedreamofcanada.ca/Who/whokilld2.htm

Second, you may have heard that Canada and the EU are planning to enter into a new deep integration agreement.

As reported in the Globe and Mail on September 18, “Canadian and European officials say they plan to begin negotiating a massive agreement to integrate Canada’s economy with the 27 nations of the European Union, with preliminary talks to be launched at an Oct. 17 summit in Montreal three days after the federal election.” The article continues, “…a senior EU official involved in the talks described (them) as ‘deep economic integration negotiations.’”

The text of this deal will not be released to the general public during the election, yet it appears big business has already seen the deal and supports it–meaning that once again, Canadians will not have the democratic right to choose whether or not to enter into the deal, while big business makes up our minds for us.

For more information see:

To comment on the article on Vive visit:

And if you’d like to send an email to the current Prime Minister opposing this deal, please visit the Council of Canadians website and use their sample letter:

We at Vive also highly recommend that you attend local all-candidates forums, town halls and meetings in your area and ask these simple questions, or additional questions of your own that raise these issues:

1. Have you heard of Canada-U.S. deep integration agreements, such as the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)? Do you feel that they threaten Canadian sovereignty and democracy?

2. Are you aware that the Conservative government is planning on negotiating a new deep integration agreement with the European Union? Do you support such a deal, or do you feel that it would threaten Canadian sovereignty and democracy?

3. If elected, would you ensure that there was parliamentary oversight of any deep integration deals, such as the SPP or the proposed deep integration deal with the EU?

Together, we can make Canadian sovereignty and democracy a federal election issue. If we don’t, we run the risk of watching even more of our sovereignty given away once the election is over.

By holding our candidates accountable, we have everything to gain…and if we don’t, we have our country to lose.

– Susan Thompson

KSP: Harper’s Agenda / Unwarranted Media Bias Against Dion

September 20, 2008

The opinion piece below was written by my good friend, KSP. It is posted here with permission:

It seems I was right and Harper pulled an election to avoid this. It happened a little faster than he expected though and he can’t turn back. That military takeover is a distinct possibility; that may explain PMSH’s confidence and the fact his people are not campaigning; he doesn’t worry about local ridings chances at all. I still say he is sure the US will take us over, when their civil unrest hits the streets. Bush will keep him in power as his personal puppet. Remember Harper allowed the armed forces to sign a deal in February that he will supply soldiers to th US if they rebel and the US will do the same for him. As things stand in the marketpalce, all this could happen before the election in November. Why else would they appoint that bimbo Palin, to distract the public? McCain will not be reelected, Bush will not leave office. He can declare himself Commander in chief in times of trouble, declare Martial Law and that’s it. Of course, the following bloodbath will be horrid to behold, when all the poor hungry people go on a rampage with their guns ablaze. The 800 FEMA concentration camps will come in mighty handy. (Google FEMA concentration camps). I am hoping they will be too busy with their problems to bother with Canada for the time being. (They also have another possible scenario, start another war. Either Pakistan or Iran will do.)

The only chance we have to get out ot this is to elect Dion. He may be able to ward off a collapse here by nationalizing the financial system and put the Bank of Canada in charge. Their mandate is or precisely was, to keep Canada safe and prosperous. The act says the bank can lend money from future projected revenue and lend to the banks and businesses at minimal rates. Which means the interest goes back to the government and foreign bankers cannot charge high interest rates set by their private owners like the FED and take money out of the country and bleed it dry. He is not a corporate hack, he is a professor and he has a vision. If he becomes PM, his own party people will have to follow his lead, much like they did Trudeau. He will have the power to implement his vision which will be to make Canada as good a country as Sweden. I actually think he can do it. Of course, a major civil war in the US will help greatly, 10% of Americans know this is coming and are armed to the teeth because of it. Most of them have been hoarding food, ammunition and gold for such an emergency. (Ten percent is 30 million very angry patriotic citizens.) This will be the first time a government tries to take over a nation with more ammo than the military. I can’t say I can predict which side would win. However, a 1798 type revolution where the upper class was guillotined might happen here with the Senate, Congress and the Banking members enjoying similarly effective poetic justice.

Since a currency crash might affect our banking system it may be advisable to keep some cash at home for emergencies. Food for a few months might help too. This is too big to predict and anything could happen. I am hoping that since a great many governments know about this impending disaster, they might have devised a system to act when a crash occurs. Because th US dollar is the reserve currency of the world everyone will be equally affected. China is threatening to pull away from US dollars and nobody is buying US Treasuries anymore. They are very close to a meltdown. The minute the dollar stops being the reserve currency the dollar will crash. The consequences are too long to explain; suffice it to say it will be disastrous for the US and to all the poorer countries without vast resources like Canada. We must put all effort in this election to get Dion into power; he alone has the vision and brainpower to find a solution to this unmitigated mess. If not, heaven help us all.

About me:

I am not paranoid or a lunatic, but everything seems to point in this direction. Hope I am wrong. I base these thoughts on my extensive reading and my vast knowledge of history. Also having been born under a Nazi regime and witnessing the takeover of the Communists in 1948; I think my judgment is fairly reasonable. I knew about the coming meltdown over 2 years ago. KSP

See related articles:


Unwarranted Media Bias Against Dion:

In the past few weeks the press has been overly negative, as if promoting a very well educated, good man to run this country would be bad for us. I would like to mention that the spin on his image as a weak leader is utter rubbish. In Canada the word Prime Minister means just that, first minister of the many elected able members. It does not mean a dictator, it means first among equals. In an educated society, especially where the baby boomers outnumber the young, why would we need a younger dogmatic ideologue to decide things for us? Are the people that built this country since the Second World War incapable of making decisions about what is good for ourselves? Do we really think we have a president in the making? … [Read more here]

Progressives for Stephane Dion: Alerts Page

Progressives for Stephane Dion: Home Page

One World Government. Is this what we want??

August 26, 2008

I believe this is very important. Don’t be among the apathetic sheeple! Please watch the YouTube video clip before it is withheld or cancelled..


The True Story of the Bilderberg Group – by Daniel Estulin

July 26, 2008
The True Story of the Bilderberg Group - by Daniel Estulin

The True Story of the Bilderberg Group - by Daniel Estulin

This book by investigative journalist Daniel Estulin is a must read for all Canadians, Americans, and citizens of countries throughout our world who care about their sovereignty — and any semblance of ‘democracy’ they think they have or aspire toward.

Bilderberg Club – the Mother of all Secret Societies


In 1954, the most powerful men in the world met for the first time under the auspices of the Dutch royal crown and the Rockefeller family in the luxurious Hotel Bilderberg of the small Dutch town of Oosterbeek. For an entire weekend, they debated the future of the world. When it was over, they decided to meet once every year to exchange ideas and analyze international affairs. They named themselves the Bilderberg Club. Since then, they have gathered yearly in a luxurious hotel somewhere in the world to decide the future of humanity. Among the select members of this club are Bill Clinton, Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Toni Blair and many other heads of government, businessmen, politicians, bankers and journalists from all over the world.

Nevertheless, in the more than fifty years of their meetings, the press has never been allowed to attend, no statements have ever been released on the attendees’ conclusions, nor has any agenda for a Bilderberg meeting been made public. Leaders of the Bilderberg Club argue that this discretion is necessary to allow participants in the debates to speak freely without being on record or reported publicly. Otherwise, Bilderbergers claim, they would be forced to speak in the language of a press release. Doubtlessly, this discretion allows the Bilderberg Club to deliberate more freely, but that does not respond to the fundamental question: What do the world’s most powerful people talk about in these meetings?

Any modern democratic system protects the right to privacy, but doesn’t the public have a right to know what their political leaders are talking about when they meet the wealthiest business leaders of their respective countries? What guarantees do citizens have that the Bilderberg Club isn’t a centre for influence trafficking and lobbying if they aren’t allowed to know what their representatives talk about at the Club’s secret gatherings? Why are the Davos World Economic Forum and G8 meetings carried in every newspaper, given front page coverage, with thousands of journalists in attendance, while no one covers Bilderberg Club meetings even though they are annually attended by Presidents of the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, Federal Reserve, chairmen of 100 most powerful corporations in the world such as DaimlerChrysler, Coca Cola, British Petroleum, Chase Manhattan Bank, American Express, Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Vice Presidents of the United States, Directors of the CIA and the FBI, General Secretaries of NATO, American Senators and members of Congress, European Prime Ministers and leaders of opposition parties, top editors and CEOs of the leading newspapers in the world. It is surprising that no mainstream media outlets consider a gathering of such figures, whose wealth far exceeds the combined wealth of all United States citizens, to be newsworthy when a trip by any one of them on their own makes headline news on TV.

Read more here.

Based in Spain, Daniel Estulin is an award-winning investigative journalist who has been researching the Bilderberg Group for over 15 years. He is the author of La Verdadera Historia del Club Bilderberg (2005), a best seller in Spain and now in its 15th printing; it has been translated into 29 languages and sold in over 49 countries. Estulin is also the host of two radio shows in Spain.

More info about the book, its author and updates about the Bilderberg Group (and their secret meetings) at: BilderbergBook.com.

Buy the book online from TrineDay here.:

Unravel one of the best-kept secrets in political history.

Delving into a world once shrouded in complete mystery and impenetrable security, this investigative report provides a fascinating account of the annual meetings of the world’s most powerful people—the Bilderberg Group. Since its inception in 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel in the small Dutch town of Oosterbeek, the Bilderberg Group has been comprised of European prime ministers, American presidents, and the wealthiest CEOs of the world, all coming together to discuss the economic and political future of humanity. The press has never been allowed to attend, nor have statements ever been released on the attendees’ conclusions or discussions, which have ramifications on the citizens of the world. Using methods that resemble the spy tactics of the Cold War—and in several instances putting his own life on the line—the author did what no one else has managed to achieve: he learned what was being said behind the closed doors of the opulent hotels and has made it available to the public for the first time.

Buy the book on Amazon.com here.

I don’t care where you buy this book: The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, as long as you buy it somewhere, and read it, then TELL your friends about it! Contrary what we are led to believe, ignorance is NOT bliss; our governments do NOT have our best interests at heart; and to be one of the sheeple in this information age is inexcusable!

Canada Day – Another view: “Will the USA Invade Canada?”

July 2, 2008

Regardless of what you think about Canada-US relations, this piece written by Carlton Meyer for Sanderson Research Associates Ltd. is thought-provoking reading for Canadians as we reflect on our country’s past, present and future on this Canada Day. Is Myer’s view inconceivable, improbable, impossible? Is it far-fetched? Or could it be a possible scenario as the USA faces its worst crisis since the Great Depression? According to Carlton Myer this invasion of Canada has already begun.  I tend to agree …

Will the USA Invade Canada?

By Carlton Meyer
Active ImageCanada is now considered an unimportant good neighbor by the superpower to its south. A recent effort to create a “North American Union” (NAU) with Canada, the USA, and Mexico is a semi-secret effort by industrialists in these three nations. The goal is similar to the “European Union” in that it would allow low-cost Mexican labor and abundant Canadian energy reserves to fuel the huge industrial machine of the USA and create the world’s greatest economic power. The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is the cornerstone of this union.

Few Americans know that Canada is the leading source of imported energy to the USA. They are the biggest source of foreign oil, natural gas, uranium, and even electricity. As energy costs recently doubled, Canada is becoming wealthy, at the expense of its southern neighbor. This has weakened Canadian support for a NAU. The obnoxious foreign policy of President George Bush has nearly derailed it.

Battle of Lake Erie, 1812

The USA invaded Canada during its war with Britain in 1812. It was thought the conquest would be easy, but Canadians did not welcome their “liberators” from the south. In the 1930s, the U.S. military developed a detailed 94-page document called “Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan – Red” for invading Canada. The plan called for the U.S. military to launch a surprise attack to capture the port city of Halifax, cutting the Canadians off from their British allies. Canadian power plants near Niagara Falls would be seized as the U.S. Army invaded on three fronts — marching from Vermont to take Montreal and Quebec, charging out of North Dakota to grab the railroad center at Winnipeg, and storming out of the Midwest to capture the strategic nickel mines of Ontario. Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy seizes the Great Lakes and blockades Canada’s ports.[1]

That invasion plan was scrapped as World War II began. Canada is now considered an unimportant good neighbor by the superpower to its south. A recent effort to create a “North American Union” (NAU) with Canada, the USA, and Mexico is a semi-secret effort by industrialists in these three nations.[2] The goal is similar to the “European Union” in that it would allow low-cost Mexican labor and abundant Canadian energy reserves to fuel the huge industrial machine of the USA and create the world’s greatest economic power. The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is the cornerstone of this union.

Active ImageHowever, the free movement of cheap labor from Mexico resulted in angry opposition from American workers. Legal obstacles have been evaded by encouraging illegal immigration. Current immigration laws are rarely enforced and the number of illegal immigrants is now so great that they openly hold political rallies and make demands. As a result, NAU leaders are attempting to squeeze a second amnesty law through the U.S. Congress to provide legal status to this cheap labor. This will ensure that millions more Mexicans flood across the lightly patrolled border and depress wages further, thus boosting profits with what NAU leaders call the “free movement of labor.”

Few Americans know that Canada is the leading source of imported energy to the USA. They are the biggest source of foreign oil, natural gas, uranium, and even electricity. As energy costs recently doubled, Canada is becoming wealthy, at the expense of its southern neighbor. This has weakened Canadian support for a NAU. The obnoxious foreign policy of President George Bush has nearly derailed it.

As energy prices continue to rise, economic growth and prosperity in the USA will stall, and then decline, while Canada enjoys an economic boom. This will result in envy and plots to secure Canada’s energy wealth for all North Americans. Mexico will soon need Canadian energy as well since its oil reserves are rapidly depleting and are projected to run out in a decade.[3]

Active Image

Meanwhile, a direct military confrontation is possible as the “Canada Canal” opens. While the media is full of stories about global warming, there is little convincing data. Since scientists are unable to predict the weather one week from now, one must doubt their projections of what may happen two decades from now. Nevertheless, arctic ice is melting and the long-sought “Northwest Passage” through Canada’s frozen north is now navigable for a few weeks each summer. Some scientists predict that all artic ice will melt within a couple of decades, keeping this route open year around. If ice continues to melt, this passage will become a transit route for ships trading between Europe and Asia. Commercial ships can shave off some 2500 miles from Europe to Asia compared with current routes through the Panama Canal. In addition, most modern container ships are too large to transit the Panama Canal, which is expensive and requires up to two weeks anyway.

Active Image

Active ImageMoreover, melting ice will allow practical access to arctic energy reserves that Canada claims. Huge energy reserves are suspected in this region, yet there is no road or rail access. As ice melts and the sea emerges, long dormant territorial disputes have arisen. Two years ago, Denmark, which rules Greenland, was angered by a visit of Canada’s defense minister, Bill Graham, on disputed Hans Island. He stayed for a short while, examining a new Maple Leaf flag planted by Canadian servicemen there, and an old flag left by a Danish naval party three years earlier. Denmark dispatched the naval cutter Tulugaq and threatened to land more men. However, as tensions rose, the rival claimants agreed to discuss the dispute at the United Nations.[4]

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently said that six to eight Navy patrol ships have been assigned to guard what he says are Canadian waters. A deepwater port will be built in a region the U.S. Geological Survey estimates has as much as 25 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas. Harper proclaimed:

“Canada has a choice when it comes to defending our sovereignty over the Arctic. We either use it or lose it. And make no mistake; this government intends to use it. It is no exaggeration to say that the need to assert our sovereignty and protect our territorial integrity in the North on our terms have never been more urgent.”[5]

Ambassador David WilkinsMeanwhile, U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins criticized Harper, claiming the Northwest Passage as “neutral waters.” The U.S. Navy has sent ships and submarines through the passage in recent years without Canadian permission. It seems inconceivable that the USA would use this as an excuse to invade Canada, but if energy prices double yet again “something” may happen as the CIA shifts its misinformation and political manipulation machine to secretly destabilize the Canadian government. They could argue the area is not inhabited by real Canadians, just the indigenous Inuit. Perhaps a “Free Inuit” movement will appear, secretly backed by the USA. The few thousand Inuit could become wealthy and may eagerly sign whatever oil contracts they are presented. The long-standing “Stephen Harper” movement could be used to divide Canada and blame trouble on the French-speaking Canadians that dominate the province of Quebec. Should Quebec become independent, this would split Canada.

Meanwhile, NAU operatives could instigate political scandals and possible terror attacks to create fear and uncertainty among the Canadian people. NAU backed political candidates could push for an independent energy-rich Western Canada, or direct annexation for these western provinces to become new states in the USA, all in the interest of security of course. Or, perhaps NAU promoters will toss a billion dollars into a political campaign for Canada to submit. Recall how easily the British have always suckered peaceful Canadians into joining in their European wars. Any Canadians who protest their loss of sovereignty would be labeled “extremists nationalists” and subject to arrest for organizing “terror groups.”

Such actions may seem extreme, but the USA spends over $40 billion a year on “intelligence” agencies that are experts at manipulating foreign governments through bribery, blackmail, mass misinformation, and even assassinations.[6] These people will not sit back as their nation’s economic power collapses when wealth flows across its northern border, especially if it results in severe budget cuts to their secretive organizations. Most large North American corporations operate in both the USA and Canada, and they will use their influence to see that “free trade” includes equal access to Canada’s energy resources at a “fair” price. The media conglomerates could ensure that most Canadians are unaware or even supportive of exporting their natural resources at below market rates. It will be interesting to watch this invasion of Canada unfold, as it has already begun.


[1]Raiding the Icebox; Behind Its Warm Front, the United States Made Cold Calculations to Subdue Canada“; Washington Post, Dec. 30, 2005.

[2] An excellent list of recent “North American Union” agreements can be found at “Source Watch “.

[3] International Energy Outlook 2007, Chapter 3, EIA.

[4]Canada flexes its muscles in dispute over Arctic wastes“, Telegraph U.K., August 8, 2005.

[5]Canada Tightens Grip on Disputed Arctic“, AP, July 9, 2007.

[6]Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,” John Perkins, 2005.